|
|
Post by gazz on Mar 8, 2014 14:14:43 GMT
I have said it before, and I'll say it again, why we didn't just fold in 2010 and start again. Too many people were involved in pulling us out of admin that didn't give a sh*t.
If a Camel is considered to be a horse designed by committee, what does that make us, a f***ing Donkey?!
|
|
|
|
Post by ceefer on Mar 11, 2014 19:37:10 GMT
Certain conditions are not met...
The SK offered to help run the club if I understand correctly... Isn't that what our famous CEO supposed to do. I would think that he as a shareholder and 'employee'
Of the club wouldn't want to let go of the reins and I guess Fearn wouldn't want McK out of the picture.
Only conjecture but that could be an area of contention.
Could be way of the mark tho'
|
|
|
|
Post by gazz on Mar 11, 2014 20:00:19 GMT
I think Spencer Fearn is having a huge say, and that is why McKnight is still in a job, eyes and ears and all that. I think that if he sold his interest in the club tomorrow, McKnight would be clearing his desk soon after. As I said, I think the reason the SK bid failed is because Jim and Fitzy were involved.
Remember who sacked Jim, and why Fitzy resigned from his 'place' on the board, coupled with SF's comments regarding Jim as not being a manager he would have employed as he came with "baggage". So there is significant history there.
Spencer Fearn may not be involved with the club directly, but his shares mean he still has a massive say in what goes on here. Let him contact the admins and have this post removed, but it doesn't take a degree in the bleeding obvious to come to the same conclusion.
|
|
