|
Post by bringbacklenwhite on Feb 23, 2014 20:47:39 GMT
Excuses, excuses !!
|
|
|
Post by Epworth Hatter OLD account on Feb 23, 2014 20:52:18 GMT
Brentford for me, please.
|
|
|
Post by gazz on Feb 23, 2014 21:31:38 GMT
I'll have Sir Tom's Proud Preston please, Mr. Sandman.
|
|
|
Post by bringbacklenwhite on Feb 23, 2014 21:38:49 GMT
In that case I will go with Coventry City, thank you very much.
|
|
|
Post by countybenno on Feb 24, 2014 9:18:52 GMT
I'll have Peterborough please Sandy
|
|
|
Post by shropshirehatter on Feb 24, 2014 14:44:23 GMT
I'll go for MK Dons please
|
|
|
Post by marketharborough on Feb 24, 2014 15:59:43 GMT
I'll have Gillingham then
|
|
|
Post by harrogatehatter on Feb 24, 2014 17:32:56 GMT
Bristol City please.
|
|
|
Post by bringbacklenwhite on Mar 1, 2014 16:23:23 GMT
Rotherham looking like a good shout for Sir Rog !!
|
|
|
Post by sandbachhatter on Mar 3, 2014 8:21:42 GMT
Well, Sir Roger's early guess, and particularly his choice of Rotherham, really paid off this week as they scored him a colossal 9 points (by winning 6-0) and as a result Rog now looks almost unbeatable as we go into the final week. Here's the table:
1. Sir Roger 19 2. Hatter in Macc 14 3= Archie 12 Gazza 12 5. BBLW 11 6. Market Harborough 10 7. Calliope 7 8= Epworth 6 Harrogate 6 10. County Benno 5 11. Down Under 2 12. Shropshire 0
|
|
|
Post by hatter_in_macc on Mar 3, 2014 9:38:05 GMT
Going to be needing snookers in the League Two week!
Well played, Rog.
|
|
|
Post by bringbacklenwhite on Mar 3, 2014 9:52:57 GMT
Excellent choicing, Sir Rog.
That lead look unassailable.
|
|
|
Post by sirroger on Mar 3, 2014 12:18:42 GMT
I've suddenly become a tad unsure about Fleetwood grabbing a win at Torquay.
I can feel it in my water.
|
|
|
Post by gazz on Mar 3, 2014 13:19:38 GMT
Seriously well played, Rog!
|
|
|
Post by hatter_in_macc on Mar 3, 2014 13:25:16 GMT
Relax, Rog. I would still need Oxford to win at The Kassam, as well as scoring at least three in the process, against fellow play-off hopefuls.
And, having just checked the form in further detail, I see that they're lousy at home - dammit! No wonder that more discerning quizzers ahead of me avoided them...:-(
|
|