Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2020 16:56:25 GMT
Is your brother thinking of this Michael Gove?
"I think that the people of Great Britain have had enough of experts from organisations with acronyms saying that they know what is best and getting it consistently wrong, because these people are the same ones who got it consistently wrong".
How prescient of the man whose Government followed medical advice that favoured allowing 60% of the population to develop covid-19, that was so wrong at least one specialist thought it was satire when he first read about it.
or this one?
"I have come, reluctantly, to the conclusion that Boris [Johnson] cannot provide the leadership or build the team for the task ahead".
A man who stabbed Johnson in the back first time round allowing May to grab the leadership then, having made this remark proceeded to stick his tongue as far up Johnson's arsehole as it would go in a desperate bid to remain in Governemnt.
Or possibly this one?
"I will take all the steps necessary to give the NHS at least another £100million per week by 2020".
And here we are in 2020 with an NHS that has tested 0.16% of NHS staff for Covid-19 despite the very obvious risks to them and their patients. An NHS that has fewer intensive care beds than any major country in Europe, that has such a desperate shortage of ventilators it may need to withdraw treatment from the sickest in order to provide help for those with a better chance of survival, an NHS that is so short of protective equipment my own employer has raided it's own stores and sent the local hospital 6000 sets of PPE.
Gove was a part of the same cabinet that supported Hunt, then Health Secretary, in his refusal to provide the NHS with sufficient funds to fill obvious gaps in their service, gaps that had been highlighted by a simulation of exactly the same situation as we are now experiencing, the lessons from which were completely ignored as far back as 2016.
Your brother must mean another Micheal Gove because the one I'm writing about is a tw##!
|
|
|
Post by hermannsays on Apr 2, 2020 17:30:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by gazz on Apr 2, 2020 18:02:09 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2020 18:19:32 GMT
It's an FAA directive, the Federal Aviation Authority being the US equivalent of the Civil Aviation Authority and EASA. It's something to do with rebooting the software and at that point I'll exit stage left because you'll know more about that than me. What I know about computers and software could be written in large font on the back of a postage stamp. Given the cost of the things I'm astonished that anyone can afford to have one on the ground for 51 days although no doubt the present circumstances mean that it will be happening a bit more often. There's been a number of problems with the 787, not least with its RR Trent engines in which there was significant cracking in the IPT blades caused by an unexpected chemical reaction in the nickel-alloy which was in turn caused by high levels of sulphur ingested by the engine during operation in Asia in particular. The last they need is iffy software I should have thought.
|
|
|
Post by gazz on Apr 2, 2020 18:42:20 GMT
It's an FAA directive, the Federal Aviation Authority being the US equivalent of the Civil Aviation Authority and EASA. It's something to do with rebooting the software and at that point I'll exit stage left because you'll know more about that than me. What I know about computers and software could be written in large font on the back of a postage stamp. Given the cost of the things I'm astonished that anyone can afford to have one on the ground for 51 days although no doubt the present circumstances mean that it will be happening a bit more often. There's been a number of problems with the 787, not least with its RR Trent engines in which there was significant cracking in the IPT blades caused by an unexpected chemical reaction in the nickel-alloy which was in turn caused by high levels of sulphur ingested by the engine during operation in Asia in particular. The last they need is iffy software I should have thought. Christ! Boeing are having some serious problems with their aircraft lately, mate, why do you think that is?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2020 19:23:07 GMT
It's an FAA directive, the Federal Aviation Authority being the US equivalent of the Civil Aviation Authority and EASA. It's something to do with rebooting the software and at that point I'll exit stage left because you'll know more about that than me. What I know about computers and software could be written in large font on the back of a postage stamp. Given the cost of the things I'm astonished that anyone can afford to have one on the ground for 51 days although no doubt the present circumstances mean that it will be happening a bit more often. There's been a number of problems with the 787, not least with its RR Trent engines in which there was significant cracking in the IPT blades caused by an unexpected chemical reaction in the nickel-alloy which was in turn caused by high levels of sulphur ingested by the engine during operation in Asia in particular. The last they need is iffy software I should have thought. Christ! Boeing are having some serious problems with their aircraft lately, mate, why do you think that is? To be fair to Boeing the engine problem was actually a Rolls-Royce problem which cost them an arm and a leg to correct both in root cause investigation, redesign and the development of more rigorous acceptance testing but you're right, 737 has had major problems and I suspect that it's for largely the same reason I suspect that Toyota had to have some product recalls a few years ago. They took their eye off quality and forgot what it was that made them world leaders. In the case of Boeing, Airbus went from nothing to competitor in very short order. Very simply, they cut corners to try and maintain a competitive advantage, frequently a big mistake. Airbus on the other hand are a very demanding customer, by far the hardest to satisfy than any other customer I've ever worked for, as my present employer is likely to find out lol.
|
|
|
Post by gazz on Apr 2, 2020 19:36:04 GMT
Thanks once again for the excellent insight, mate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2020 11:30:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by gazz on Apr 14, 2020 12:14:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by bringbacklenwhite on Apr 14, 2020 12:54:12 GMT
One way to cure constipation !!!
|
|
|
Post by gazz on Apr 17, 2020 9:12:05 GMT
|
|
|
Post by gazz on Apr 17, 2020 9:55:51 GMT
....or this absolutely staggering display of double standards by another sh*tty national rag: The above image was posted on MB this morning by Posterman. It really does defy belief.
|
|
|
Post by bringbacklenwhite on Apr 17, 2020 10:43:10 GMT
Of course, these are all the bastards that come over here nicking jobs of our good honest citizens, so vote for Brexit !
Oh, HANG ON ! I am 4 years too late.
|
|
|
Post by gazz on Apr 17, 2020 10:52:27 GMT
Of course, these are all the b*st*rds that come over here nicking jobs of our good honest citizens, so vote for Brexit ! Oh, HANG ON ! I am 4 years too late. Exactly, matey and for "high employment" in the UK making recruiting British fruit pickers harder, the reality is that these Romanian workers will almost certainly be working for less money, even though the 'official' line will be to claim otherwise.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2020 11:27:09 GMT
Where to start with this? Reference to a "land army" for one. Sorry but ffs is this bloody country ever going to be allowed to move on from the war? It finished 75 years ago, to have been a combatant, you'd need to be 92!
These "critically important" people are just that so leave the snarky f***ing speech marks out of it because it suggests that somehow the statement is wrong. Without them, the crops they will be picking will rot in the fields because the natives don't want to do it, that means they are critically important.
|
|